4th Circuit Rules on Immigration Ban

Updating you on the Immigration Ban lawsuit.  The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals issued its decision affirming the stay of the Executive Order issued by the district court.  Our Amicus Brief with 16 Bishops of the Episcopal Church signing was joined with countless others and presented in opening arguments in the case.  There is a similar action pending in the 9th Circuit.  I post the first paragraph of the ruling written by the court and presented by Chief Judge Gregory.

 

The question for this Court, distilled to its essential form, is whether the Constitution, as the Supreme Court declared in Ex parte Milligan, 71 U.S. (4 Wall.) 2, 120 (1866), remains “a law for rulers and people, equally in war and in peace.” And if so, whether it protects Plaintiffs’ right to challenge an Executive Order that in text speaks with vague words of national security, but in context drips with religious intolerance, animus, and discrimination. Surely the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment yet stands as an untiring sentinel for the protection of one of our most cherished founding principles—that government shall not establish any religious orthodoxy, or favor or disfavor one religion over another. Congress granted the President broad power to deny entry to aliens, but that power is not absolute. It cannot go unchecked when, as here, the President wields it through an executive edict that stands to cause irreparable harm to individuals across this nation. Therefore, for the reasons that follow, we affirm in substantial part the district court’s issuance of a nationwide preliminary injunction as to Section 2(c) of the challenged Executive Order.

 

Full text Episcopal Bishops Amicus Curiae Brief – 4th circuit